Sons of Older Fathers Are Geekier, Study Says
According to new research, sons of older fathers are
"geekier;" i.e. they're smarter, focused and don't care as much about
fitting in with their peers. Translational Psychiatry
published the research Tuesday from the New King's College London and
the Seaver Autism Center for Research and Treatment at the Icahn School
of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York.
Researchers gathered data from almost 8,000 twins based in the U.K., reports The Guardian.
The twins took online tests at age 12 meant to gauge their "geek-like"
traits, including how socially detached they were. That study had also
asked parents how peers see their children and if their children were
particularly interested in certain subjects.
With this data, the researchers calculated each child's "geek index" and found higher scores correlated with the sons of older dads.
Fathers 25 years old or younger saw children with an average score of
39.6, compared to 41 for children whose dads were 35 to 44 years old and
47 for those whose dads were more than 50 years old, reports The
Guardian.
They accounted for the socioeconomic status,
qualifications and employment of their parents, and also discovered
these "geeks" performed better on exams (especially in subjects of
science, technology, engineering or math) years following the index
measurement.
This study follows other research indicating children of older fathers face a higher risk of conditions like autism and schizophrenia.
"We have known for a while about the negative
consequences of advanced paternal age, but now we have shown that these
children may also go on to have better educational and career
prospects," study author Magdalena Janecka of King's College London and
the Seaver Autism Center at Mount Sinai said in a statement.
Going forward, these results could impact future research
on the study of older dads, "geekiness" and autism spectrum disorder.
Researchers think some of the genes for geekiness and autism overlap and
that for older fathers, they're more likely prevalent.
No comments